Challenges and Opportunities in Central and Southern Europe and North America
Researchers have evaluated the development of mechanized cut-to-length (CTL) harvesting systems outside of the Nordic countries in areas with great potential but limited adoption. They explored the Nordic countries for context, then focused on Central/Southern Europe and North America as two examples. Within North America, they highlighted the US South as an area of potential growth for CTL systems, despite this region currently being dominated by full-tree harvesting. They reviewed the past, present, and future uses and applications of the mechanized CTL system, examining its capabilities, limitations, successes, failures, and opportunities.
GIS-based applications for CTL machines continue to advance, utilizing new data and technologies for harvest planning and machine trafficking to avoid wet or sensitive areas. Communication between machines related to pile assortment and location continues to improve, streamlining CTL team efficiency. The introduction of machine-mounted terrestrial LiDAR for tree selection during thinning is promising and may accelerate the development of autonomous capabilities. Unfortunately, the widescale adoption of these technologies is limited beyond the Nordic countries, where significant market and logistical challenges remain.
Mechanized CTL harvesting technologies and capabilities have advanced significantly since their inception in the 1970s, with current machines representing the highest levels of mechanization, safety, ergonomics, technology, and site impact mitigation. However, several limitations impede the system’s widescale adoption such as 1) the lack of effective operator training, 2) market constraints limiting the justification for value recovery benefits in small-diameter harvests, 3) lack of industry adoption of CTL-sized wood in markets dominated by tree-length stems, and 4) challenges related to productivity and cost when compared to full-tree systems.
The information was published in Current Forestry Reports, 2025. The authors were M. Chad Bolding, Joseph L. Conrad IV, Lars Eliasson, Raffaele Spinelli, Natascia Magagnotti, Timothy R. Miller & Hasini Mapatunage. Source